Why Intelligent Design Isn't

Bush: "I think that part of education is to expose people to different schools of thought," Bush said. "You're asking me whether or not people ought to be exposed to different ideas, the answer is yes."

Via: I'd like to expose people to the idea that it's high time for impeachment.

Josh Rosenau at Thoughts from Kansas:
http://jgrr.blogspot.com/

"The National Academy of Sciences and the American Association for the Advancement of Science have both concluded that there's no scientific basis for intelligent design and oppose its inclusion in school science classes.

Never forget that the President's science advisor said "Evolution is the cornerstone of modern biology. Period. What else can you say?" Apparently, the President doesn't like the advice he's getting. Saying we should expose people to different ideas is such a cop-out. Creationism isn't a "school of thought," and neither is evolution. Science is a school of thought, and theology is another. Offer a comparative religion class if you want to teach creationism. Don't redefine science."

Which would YOU choose?